<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Quality on Notes from the Rabbit Hole</title><link>https://magnus919.com/tags/quality/</link><description>Recent content in Quality on Notes from the Rabbit Hole</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><copyright>© [Magnus Hedemark](https://github.com/magnus919)</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 17:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://magnus919.com/tags/quality/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>A Better Question for the Engineer</title><link>https://magnus919.com/2026/10/a-better-question-for-the-engineer/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://magnus919.com/2026/10/a-better-question-for-the-engineer/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Noelle Tolve has already written the epic when she asks AI to review it. She asks for criticism from an engineer&amp;rsquo;s or architect&amp;rsquo;s perspective, reads the suggestions, and uses the ones that make sense. Then she talks to her engineers.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;I let AI poke some holes in my epic,&amp;rdquo; she said.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;She welcomes criticism from the engineers, too. They know the system they&amp;rsquo;re being asked to change. A suggestion from the model might give her something to ask them about, but it doesn&amp;rsquo;t settle the question.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>