<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Paper on Notes from the Rabbit Hole</title><link>https://magnus919.com/tags/paper/</link><description>Recent content in Paper on Notes from the Rabbit Hole</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><copyright>© [Magnus Hedemark](https://github.com/magnus919)</copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 21:15:54 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://magnus919.com/tags/paper/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>William Hannah: paper tough enough for fountain pens?</title><link>https://magnus919.com/2016/02/william-hannah-paper-tough-enough-for-fountain-pens/</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 21:15:54 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://magnus919.com/2016/02/william-hannah-paper-tough-enough-for-fountain-pens/</guid><description>&lt;p>Fountain pens are brutal on paper. Moleskines are among the first to fall, paper failing in some disgusting combination of feathering, shadowing, and bleeding through when subjected to the abuse of a fountain pen. When the &lt;a href="http://www.williamhannah.com/">William Hannah Limited&lt;/a> fan &lt;a href="https://www.facebook.com/WilliamHannahUK/">page on Facebook&lt;/a> led a status update with the following, I expected them to fail:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>Ever since our notebooks came to the attention of the Fountain Pen community, the attractiveness of our incoming mail has increased significantly&amp;hellip;.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>