<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Future on Notes from the Rabbit Hole</title><link>https://magnus919.com/tags/future/</link><description>Recent content in Future on Notes from the Rabbit Hole</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><copyright>© [Magnus Hedemark](https://github.com/magnus919)</copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 00:43:18 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://magnus919.com/tags/future/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>If AI Does More of the Coding, What Should People Get Back?</title><link>https://magnus919.com/2026/11/if-ai-does-more-of-the-coding-what-should-people-get-back/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 00:43:18 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://magnus919.com/2026/11/if-ai-does-more-of-the-coding-what-should-people-get-back/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Suppose the breakthrough actually happens.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Suppose that five years from now, in 2031, AI coding agents are no longer fickle assistants that hallucinate package names or drop security checks. Suppose they can reliably scaffold distributed architectures, generate rock-solid regression suites, migrate legacy databases, and deploy immutable infrastructure with verified formal proofs.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;If the machines take on the overwhelming mechanical burden of writing code, what should happen to the humans who build software?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>